diff options
| author | Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> | 2017-04-29 22:52:42 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Michael Bestas <mkbestas@lineageos.org> | 2022-04-19 00:50:45 +0300 |
| commit | e935a6568e0e04b8045c2906b16260914a69909d (patch) | |
| tree | 8e9a768cb626cac19f79a0865fa329130d2675c1 /samples/bpf/test_verifier.c | |
| parent | 2942b407cb3276ce74630480676854b19ebb619a (diff) | |
bpf: enhance verifier to understand stack pointer arithmetic
[ Upstream commit 332270fdc8b6fba07d059a9ad44df9e1a2ad4529 ]
llvm 4.0 and above generates the code like below:
....
440: (b7) r1 = 15
441: (05) goto pc+73
515: (79) r6 = *(u64 *)(r10 -152)
516: (bf) r7 = r10
517: (07) r7 += -112
518: (bf) r2 = r7
519: (0f) r2 += r1
520: (71) r1 = *(u8 *)(r8 +0)
521: (73) *(u8 *)(r2 +45) = r1
....
and the verifier complains "R2 invalid mem access 'inv'" for insn #521.
This is because verifier marks register r2 as unknown value after #519
where r2 is a stack pointer and r1 holds a constant value.
Teach verifier to recognize "stack_ptr + imm" and
"stack_ptr + reg with const val" as valid stack_ptr with new offset.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'samples/bpf/test_verifier.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | samples/bpf/test_verifier.c | 18 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/samples/bpf/test_verifier.c b/samples/bpf/test_verifier.c index 369ffaad3799..dc7dec9e64ba 100644 --- a/samples/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/samples/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -1218,16 +1218,22 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = ACCEPT, }, { - "unpriv: obfuscate stack pointer", + "stack pointer arithmetic", .insns = { - BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), - BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), - BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 4), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_7, -10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_7, -10), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_7), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(0, BPF_REG_2, 4, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_7), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, 8), + BPF_ST_MEM(0, BPF_REG_2, 4, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R2 pointer arithmetic", - .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, }, { |