summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h (follow)
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* futex: Rework futex_lock_pi() to use rt_mutex_*_proxy_lock()Peter Zijlstra2021-08-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [ Upstream commit cfafcd117da0216520568c195cb2f6cd1980c4bb ] By changing futex_lock_pi() to use rt_mutex_*_proxy_lock() all wait_list modifications are done under both hb->lock and wait_lock. This closes the obvious interleave pattern between futex_lock_pi() and futex_unlock_pi(), but not entirely so. See below: Before: futex_lock_pi() futex_unlock_pi() unlock hb->lock lock hb->lock unlock hb->lock lock rt_mutex->wait_lock unlock rt_mutex_wait_lock -EAGAIN lock rt_mutex->wait_lock list_add unlock rt_mutex->wait_lock schedule() lock rt_mutex->wait_lock list_del unlock rt_mutex->wait_lock <idem> -EAGAIN lock hb->lock After: futex_lock_pi() futex_unlock_pi() lock hb->lock lock rt_mutex->wait_lock list_add unlock rt_mutex->wait_lock unlock hb->lock schedule() lock hb->lock unlock hb->lock lock hb->lock lock rt_mutex->wait_lock list_del unlock rt_mutex->wait_lock lock rt_mutex->wait_lock unlock rt_mutex_wait_lock -EAGAIN unlock hb->lock It does however solve the earlier starvation/live-lock scenario which got introduced with the -EAGAIN since unlike the before scenario; where the -EAGAIN happens while futex_unlock_pi() doesn't hold any locks; in the after scenario it happens while futex_unlock_pi() actually holds a lock, and then it is serialized on that lock. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: juri.lelli@arm.com Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de Cc: xlpang@redhat.com Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com Cc: jdesfossez@efficios.com Cc: dvhart@infradead.org Cc: bristot@redhat.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170322104152.062785528@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Acked-by: Joe Korty <joe.korty@concurrent-rt.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
* futex,rt_mutex: Introduce rt_mutex_init_waiter()Peter Zijlstra2021-08-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [ Upstream commit 50809358dd7199aa7ce232f6877dd09ec30ef374 ] Since there's already two copies of this code, introduce a helper now before adding a third one. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: juri.lelli@arm.com Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de Cc: xlpang@redhat.com Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com Cc: jdesfossez@efficios.com Cc: dvhart@infradead.org Cc: bristot@redhat.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170322104151.950039479@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Acked-by: Joe Korty <joe.korty@concurrent-rt.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
* rtmutex: Remove unused argument from rt_mutex_proxy_unlock()Lee Jones2021-02-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> [ Upstream commit 2156ac1934166d6deb6cd0f6ffc4c1076ec63697 ] Nothing uses the argument. Remove it as preparation to use pi_state_update_owner(). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
* futex: Avoid violating the 10th rule of futexLee Jones2021-02-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> commit c1e2f0eaf015fb7076d51a339011f2383e6dd389 upstream. Julia reported futex state corruption in the following scenario: waiter waker stealer (prio > waiter) futex(WAIT_REQUEUE_PI, uaddr, uaddr2, timeout=[N ms]) futex_wait_requeue_pi() futex_wait_queue_me() freezable_schedule() <scheduled out> futex(LOCK_PI, uaddr2) futex(CMP_REQUEUE_PI, uaddr, uaddr2, 1, 0) /* requeues waiter to uaddr2 */ futex(UNLOCK_PI, uaddr2) wake_futex_pi() cmp_futex_value_locked(uaddr2, waiter) wake_up_q() <woken by waker> <hrtimer_wakeup() fires, clears sleeper->task> futex(LOCK_PI, uaddr2) __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() try_to_take_rt_mutex() /* steals lock */ rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, stealer) <preempted> <scheduled in> rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() __rt_mutex_slowlock() try_to_take_rt_mutex() /* fails, lock held by stealer */ if (timeout && !timeout->task) return -ETIMEDOUT; fixup_owner() /* lock wasn't acquired, so, fixup_pi_state_owner skipped */ return -ETIMEDOUT; /* At this point, we've returned -ETIMEDOUT to userspace, but the * futex word shows waiter to be the owner, and the pi_mutex has * stealer as the owner */ futex_lock(LOCK_PI, uaddr2) -> bails with EDEADLK, futex word says we're owner. And suggested that what commit: 73d786bd043e ("futex: Rework inconsistent rt_mutex/futex_q state") removes from fixup_owner() looks to be just what is needed. And indeed it is -- I completely missed that requeue_pi could also result in this case. So we need to restore that, except that subsequent patches, like commit: 16ffa12d7425 ("futex: Pull rt_mutex_futex_unlock() out from under hb->lock") changed all the locking rules. Even without that, the sequence: - if (rt_mutex_futex_trylock(&q->pi_state->pi_mutex)) { - locked = 1; - goto out; - } - raw_spin_lock_irq(&q->pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); - owner = rt_mutex_owner(&q->pi_state->pi_mutex); - if (!owner) - owner = rt_mutex_next_owner(&q->pi_state->pi_mutex); - raw_spin_unlock_irq(&q->pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); - ret = fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr, q, owner); already suggests there were races; otherwise we'd never have to look at next_owner. So instead of doing 3 consecutive wait_lock sections with who knows what races, we do it all in a single section. Additionally, the usage of pi_state->owner in fixup_owner() was only safe because only the rt_mutex owner would modify it, which this additional case wrecks. Luckily the values can only change away and not to the value we're testing, this means we can do a speculative test and double check once we have the wait_lock. Fixes: 73d786bd043e ("futex: Rework inconsistent rt_mutex/futex_q state") Reported-by: Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com> Reported-by: Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@ni.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com> Tested-by: Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@ni.com> Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171208124939.7livp7no2ov65rrc@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> [Lee: Back-ported to solve a dependency] Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
* futex,rt_mutex: Provide futex specific rt_mutex APILee Jones2021-02-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> [ Upstream commit 5293c2efda37775346885c7e924d4ef7018ea60b ] Part of what makes futex_unlock_pi() intricate is that rt_mutex_futex_unlock() -> rt_mutex_slowunlock() can drop rt_mutex::wait_lock. This means it cannot rely on the atomicy of wait_lock, which would be preferred in order to not rely on hb->lock so much. The reason rt_mutex_slowunlock() needs to drop wait_lock is because it can race with the rt_mutex fastpath, however futexes have their own fast path. Since futexes already have a bunch of separate rt_mutex accessors, complete that set and implement a rt_mutex variant without fastpath for them. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: juri.lelli@arm.com Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de Cc: xlpang@redhat.com Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com Cc: jdesfossez@efficios.com Cc: dvhart@infradead.org Cc: bristot@redhat.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170322104151.702962446@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> [Lee: Back-ported to solve a dependency] Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
* futex,rt_mutex: Restructure rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock()Peter Zijlstra2019-03-23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | commit 38d589f2fd08f1296aea3ce62bebd185125c6d81 upstream. With the ultimate goal of keeping rt_mutex wait_list and futex_q waiters consistent it's necessary to split 'rt_mutex_futex_lock()' into finer parts, such that only the actual blocking can be done without hb->lock held. Split split_mutex_finish_proxy_lock() into two parts, one that does the blocking and one that does remove_waiter() when the lock acquire failed. When the rtmutex was acquired successfully the waiter can be removed in the acquisiton path safely, since there is no concurrency on the lock owner. This means that, except for futex_lock_pi(), all wait_list modifications are done with both hb->lock and wait_lock held. [bigeasy@linutronix.de: fix for futex_requeue_pi_signal_restart] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: juri.lelli@arm.com Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de Cc: xlpang@redhat.com Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com Cc: jdesfossez@efficios.com Cc: dvhart@infradead.org Cc: bristot@redhat.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170322104152.001659630@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Zubin Mithra <zsm@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
* locking/rtmutex: Use READ_ONCE() in rt_mutex_owner()Thomas Gleixner2016-12-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | commit 1be5d4fa0af34fb7bafa205aeb59f5c7cc7a089d upstream. While debugging the rtmutex unlock vs. dequeue race Will suggested to use READ_ONCE() in rt_mutex_owner() as it might race against the cmpxchg_release() in unlock_rt_mutex_safe(). Will: "It's a minor thing which will most likely not matter in practice" Careful search did not unearth an actual problem in todays code, but it's better to be safe than surprised. Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161130210030.431379999@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
* rtmutex: Delete scriptable testerDavidlohr Bueso2015-07-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | No one uses this anymore, and this is not the first time the idea of replacing it with a (now possible) userspace side. Lock stealing logic was removed long ago in when the lock was granted to the highest prio. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1435782588-4177-2-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
* futex: Lower the lock contention on the HB lock during wake upSebastian Andrzej Siewior2015-06-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | wake_futex_pi() wakes the task before releasing the hash bucket lock (HB). The first thing the woken up task usually does is to acquire the lock which requires the HB lock. On SMP Systems this leads to blocking on the HB lock which is released by the owner shortly after. This patch rearranges the unlock path by first releasing the HB lock and then waking up the task. [ tglx: Fixed up the rtmutex unlock path ] Originally-from: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150617083350.GA2433@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
* rtmutex: Cleanup deadlock detector debug logicThomas Gleixner2014-06-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The conditions under which deadlock detection is conducted are unclear and undocumented. Add constants instead of using 0/1 and provide a selection function which hides the additional debug dependency from the calling code. Add comments where needed. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140522031949.947264874@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
* rtmutex: Confine deadlock logic to futexThomas Gleixner2014-06-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | The deadlock logic is only required for futexes. Remove the extra arguments for the public functions and also for the futex specific ones which get always called with deadlock detection enabled. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
* sched/deadline: Add SCHED_DEADLINE inheritance logicDario Faggioli2014-01-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Some method to deal with rt-mutexes and make sched_dl interact with the current PI-coded is needed, raising all but trivial issues, that needs (according to us) to be solved with some restructuring of the pi-code (i.e., going toward a proxy execution-ish implementation). This is under development, in the meanwhile, as a temporary solution, what this commits does is: - ensure a pi-lock owner with waiters is never throttled down. Instead, when it runs out of runtime, it immediately gets replenished and it's deadline is postponed; - the scheduling parameters (relative deadline and default runtime) used for that replenishments --during the whole period it holds the pi-lock-- are the ones of the waiting task with earliest deadline. Acting this way, we provide some kind of boosting to the lock-owner, still by using the existing (actually, slightly modified by the previous commit) pi-architecture. We would stress the fact that this is only a surely needed, all but clean solution to the problem. In the end it's only a way to re-start discussion within the community. So, as always, comments, ideas, rants, etc.. are welcome! :-) Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com> [ Added !RT_MUTEXES build fix. ] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1383831828-15501-11-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* rtmutex: Turn the plist into an rb-treePeter Zijlstra2014-01-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Turn the pi-chains from plist to rb-tree, in the rt_mutex code, and provide a proper comparison function for -deadline and -priority tasks. This is done mainly because: - classical prio field of the plist is just an int, which might not be enough for representing a deadline; - manipulating such a list would become O(nr_deadline_tasks), which might be to much, as the number of -deadline task increases. Therefore, an rb-tree is used, and tasks are queued in it according to the following logic: - among two -priority (i.e., SCHED_BATCH/OTHER/RR/FIFO) tasks, the one with the higher (lower, actually!) prio wins; - among a -priority and a -deadline task, the latter always wins; - among two -deadline tasks, the one with the earliest deadline wins. Queueing and dequeueing functions are changed accordingly, for both the list of a task's pi-waiters and the list of tasks blocked on a pi-lock. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-again-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1383831828-15501-10-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* locking: Move the rtmutex code to kernel/locking/Peter Zijlstra2013-11-06
Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-p9ijt8div0hwldexwfm4nlhj@git.kernel.org [ Fixed build failure in kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2025-12-10 05:38:58 +0000