diff options
| author | Tao Wang <kevin.wangtao@hisilicon.com> | 2018-05-26 15:16:48 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2018-07-03 11:21:26 +0200 |
| commit | 6f5edfa503fc5e9d142ca5865464f870a1c9622d (patch) | |
| tree | e8921f4a048364ca5eabbaaab244138346b957c2 /tools/perf/scripts/python | |
| parent | a8f007c1ada54b266a28ef5bf14a98eb1cfe1ae7 (diff) | |
cpufreq: Fix new policy initialization during limits updates via sysfs
commit c7d1f119c48f64bebf0fa1e326af577c6152fe30 upstream.
If the policy limits are updated via cpufreq_update_policy() and
subsequently via sysfs, the limits stored in user_policy may be
set incorrectly.
For example, if both min and max are set via sysfs to the maximum
available frequency, user_policy.min and user_policy.max will also
be the maximum. If a policy notifier triggered by
cpufreq_update_policy() lowers both the min and the max at this
point, that change is not reflected by the user_policy limits, so
if the max is updated again via sysfs to the same lower value,
then user_policy.max will be lower than user_policy.min which
shouldn't happen. In particular, if one of the policy CPUs is
then taken offline and back online, cpufreq_set_policy() will
fail for it due to a failing limits check.
To prevent that from happening, initialize the min and max fields
of the new_policy object to the ones stored in user_policy that
were previously set via sysfs.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wangtao <kevin.wangtao@hisilicon.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Subject & changelog ]
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/scripts/python')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
