summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRoland Kammerer <roland.kammerer@linbit.com>2018-12-20 17:23:28 +0100
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2019-02-20 10:13:11 +0100
commit3b5d41253b54509853bfde93b6e2f17427e07908 (patch)
tree04062432886b89f9b8c2ee88934141932df09b17 /scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh
parent8b79471d23526de167534fb352fe6eac4ca70d40 (diff)
drbd: narrow rcu_read_lock in drbd_sync_handshake
[ Upstream commit d29e89e34952a9ad02c77109c71a80043544296e ] So far there was the possibility that we called genlmsg_new(GFP_NOIO)/mutex_lock() while holding an rcu_read_lock(). This included cases like: drbd_sync_handshake (acquire the RCU lock) drbd_asb_recover_1p drbd_khelper drbd_bcast_event genlmsg_new(GFP_NOIO) --> may sleep drbd_sync_handshake (acquire the RCU lock) drbd_asb_recover_1p drbd_khelper notify_helper genlmsg_new(GFP_NOIO) --> may sleep drbd_sync_handshake (acquire the RCU lock) drbd_asb_recover_1p drbd_khelper notify_helper mutex_lock --> may sleep While using GFP_ATOMIC whould have been possible in the first two cases, the real fix is to narrow the rcu_read_lock. Reported-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@163.com> Reviewed-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: Roland Kammerer <roland.kammerer@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions