diff options
| author | Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> | 2016-11-29 12:27:09 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Michael Bestas <mkbestas@lineageos.org> | 2022-04-19 00:50:43 +0300 |
| commit | 26c8d31fd8965ed30d4bcd25afbee6fa8c58efef (patch) | |
| tree | c38c826102c3fedfa9cd9deffeb36ba2d4f36ec1 /kernel | |
| parent | f7c1642847036680697ab92eb3eb00b5ef271bfc (diff) | |
bpf: fix states equal logic for varlen access
If we have a branch that looks something like this
int foo = map->value;
if (condition) {
foo += blah;
} else {
foo = bar;
}
map->array[foo] = baz;
We will incorrectly assume that the !condition branch is equal to the condition
branch as the register for foo will be UNKNOWN_VALUE in both cases. We need to
adjust this logic to only do this if we didn't do a varlen access after we
processed the !condition branch, otherwise we have different ranges and need to
check the other branch as well.
Fixes: 484611357c19 ("bpf: allow access into map value arrays")
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 6a936159c6e0..8199821f54cf 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -2454,6 +2454,7 @@ static bool states_equal(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_verifier_state *old, struct bpf_verifier_state *cur) { + bool varlen_map_access = env->varlen_map_value_access; struct bpf_reg_state *rold, *rcur; int i; @@ -2467,12 +2468,17 @@ static bool states_equal(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, /* If the ranges were not the same, but everything else was and * we didn't do a variable access into a map then we are a-ok. */ - if (!env->varlen_map_value_access && + if (!varlen_map_access && rold->type == rcur->type && rold->imm == rcur->imm) continue; + /* If we didn't map access then again we don't care about the + * mismatched range values and it's ok if our old type was + * UNKNOWN and we didn't go to a NOT_INIT'ed reg. + */ if (rold->type == NOT_INIT || - (rold->type == UNKNOWN_VALUE && rcur->type != NOT_INIT)) + (!varlen_map_access && rold->type == UNKNOWN_VALUE && + rcur->type != NOT_INIT)) continue; if (rold->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && rcur->type == PTR_TO_PACKET && |