diff options
| author | Gaurav Kohli <gkohli@codeaurora.org> | 2018-04-24 12:13:34 +0530 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Gerrit - the friendly Code Review server <code-review@localhost> | 2018-09-07 04:49:36 -0700 |
| commit | a5e204282a8c65f3d810ba03414c436a292b695d (patch) | |
| tree | b9501723bfd40f35a8dac1bdbe204855a1e50eb0 /fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c | |
| parent | ab3dba93ceea12d3498d522a5459631f518894ae (diff) | |
kthread/smpboot: Serialize kthread parking against wakeup
The control cpu thread which initiates hotplug calls kthread_park()
for hotplug thread and sets KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK. After this control
thread wakes up the hotplug thread. There is a chance that wakeup
code sees the hotplug thread (running on AP core) in INTERRUPTIBLE
state, but sets its state to RUNNING after hotplug thread has entered
kthread_parkme() and changed its state to TASK_PARKED. This can result
in panic later on in kthread_unpark(), as it sees KTHREAD_IS_PARKED
flag set but fails to rebind the kthread, due to it being not in
TASK_PARKED state. Fix this, by serializing wakeup state change,
against state change before parking the kthread.
Below is the possible race:
Control thread Hotplug Thread
kthread_park()
set KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK
smpboot_thread_fn
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
kthread_parkme
wake_up_process()
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags);
if (!(p->state & state)) -> this will fail
goto out;
__kthread_parkme
__set_current_state(TASK_PARKED);
if (p->on_rq && ttwu_remote(p, wake_flags))
ttwu_remote()
p->state = TASK_RUNNING;
schedule();
So to avoid this race, take pi_lock to serial state changes.
Change-Id: Ie71645d37046f7ee74df880dbead29efbaad199a
Suggested-by: Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Kohli <gkohli@codeaurora.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
