From 554ef3876c6acdff1331feab10275e9e9e0adb84 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:21:32 +0530 Subject: clockevents: Handle tick device's resume separately Upcoming patch will redefine possible states of a clockevent device. The RESUME mode is a special case only for tick's clockevent devices. In future it can be replaced by ->resume() callback already available for clockevent devices. Lets handle it separately so that clockevents_set_mode() only handles states valid across all devices. This also renames set_mode_resume() to tick_resume() to make it more explicit. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Daniel Lezcano Cc: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Kevin Hilman Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Preeti U Murthy Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org Cc: linaro-networking@linaro.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/c1b0112410870f49e7bf06958e1483eac6c15e20.1425037853.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/time/tick-common.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/time/tick-common.c') diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c index f7c515595b42..5c50664c21d7 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ void tick_resume(void) struct tick_device *td = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_device); int broadcast = tick_resume_broadcast(); - clockevents_set_mode(td->evtdev, CLOCK_EVT_MODE_RESUME); + clockevents_tick_resume(td->evtdev); if (!broadcast) { if (td->mode == TICKDEV_MODE_PERIODIC) -- cgit v1.2.3 From 77e32c89a7117614ab3d66d20c1088de721abfaa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:21:33 +0530 Subject: clockevents: Manage device's state separately for the core 'enum clock_event_mode' is used for two purposes today: - to pass mode to the driver of clockevent device::set_mode(). - for managing state of the device for clockevents core. For supporting new modes/states we have moved away from the legacy set_mode() callback to new per-mode/state callbacks. New modes/states shouldn't be exposed to the legacy (now OBSOLOTE) callbacks and so we shouldn't add new states to 'enum clock_event_mode'. Lets have separate enums for the two use cases mentioned above. Keep using the earlier enum for legacy set_mode() callback and mark it OBSOLETE. And add another enum to clearly specify the possible states of a clockevent device. This also renames the newly added per-mode callbacks to reflect state changes. We haven't got rid of 'mode' member of 'struct clock_event_device' as it is used by some of the clockevent drivers and it would automatically die down once we migrate those drivers to the new interface. It ('mode') is only updated now for the drivers using the legacy interface. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Daniel Lezcano Cc: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Kevin Hilman Cc: Preeti U Murthy Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org Cc: linaro-networking@linaro.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/b6b0143a8a57bd58352ad35e08c25424c879c0cb.1425037853.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/time/tick-common.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/time/tick-common.c') diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c index 5c50664c21d7..a5b877130ae9 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ void tick_handle_periodic(struct clock_event_device *dev) tick_periodic(cpu); - if (dev->mode != CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT) + if (dev->state != CLOCK_EVT_STATE_ONESHOT) return; for (;;) { /* @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ void tick_setup_periodic(struct clock_event_device *dev, int broadcast) if ((dev->features & CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC) && !tick_broadcast_oneshot_active()) { - clockevents_set_mode(dev, CLOCK_EVT_MODE_PERIODIC); + clockevents_set_state(dev, CLOCK_EVT_STATE_PERIODIC); } else { unsigned long seq; ktime_t next; @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ void tick_setup_periodic(struct clock_event_device *dev, int broadcast) next = tick_next_period; } while (read_seqretry(&jiffies_lock, seq)); - clockevents_set_mode(dev, CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT); + clockevents_set_state(dev, CLOCK_EVT_STATE_ONESHOT); for (;;) { if (!clockevents_program_event(dev, next, false)) @@ -365,6 +365,7 @@ void tick_shutdown(unsigned int *cpup) * Prevent that the clock events layer tries to call * the set mode function! */ + dev->state = CLOCK_EVT_STATE_DETACHED; dev->mode = CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED; clockevents_exchange_device(dev, NULL); dev->event_handler = clockevents_handle_noop; -- cgit v1.2.3 From 4ffee521f36390c7720d493591b764ca35c8030b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:09:16 +0100 Subject: clockevents: Make suspend/resume calls explicit clockevents_notify() is a leftover from the early design of the clockevents facility. It's really not a notification mechanism, it's a multiplex call. We are way better off to have explicit calls instead of this monstrosity. Split out the suspend/resume() calls and invoke them directly from the call sites. No locking required at this point because these calls happen with interrupts disabled and a single cpu online. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner [ Rebased on top of 4.0-rc5. ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/713674030.jVm1qaHuPf@vostro.rjw.lan [ Rebased on top of latest timers/core. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/time/tick-common.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/time/tick-common.c') diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c index a5b877130ae9..1a60c2ae96a8 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c @@ -373,18 +373,39 @@ void tick_shutdown(unsigned int *cpup) } } +/** + * tick_suspend - Suspend the tick and the broadcast device + * + * Called from syscore_suspend() via timekeeping_suspend with only one + * CPU online and interrupts disabled or from tick_unfreeze() under + * tick_freeze_lock. + * + * No locks required. Nothing can change the per cpu device. + */ void tick_suspend(void) { struct tick_device *td = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_device); clockevents_shutdown(td->evtdev); + tick_suspend_broadcast(); } +/** + * tick_resume - Resume the tick and the broadcast device + * + * Called from syscore_resume() via timekeeping_resume with only one + * CPU online and interrupts disabled or from tick_unfreeze() under + * tick_freeze_lock. + * + * No locks required. Nothing can change the per cpu device. + */ void tick_resume(void) { - struct tick_device *td = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_device); - int broadcast = tick_resume_broadcast(); + struct tick_device *td; + int broadcast; + broadcast = tick_resume_broadcast(); + td = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_device); clockevents_tick_resume(td->evtdev); if (!broadcast) { @@ -416,7 +437,6 @@ void tick_freeze(void) timekeeping_suspend(); } else { tick_suspend(); - tick_suspend_broadcast(); } raw_spin_unlock(&tick_freeze_lock); -- cgit v1.2.3 From f46481d0a7cb942b84145acb80ad43bdb1ff8eb4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:11:04 +0100 Subject: tick/xen: Provide and use tick_suspend_local() and tick_resume_local() Xen calls on every cpu into tick_resume() which is just wrong. tick_resume() is for the syscore global suspend/resume invocation. What XEN really wants is a per cpu local resume function. Provide a tick_resume_local() function and use it in XEN. Also provide a complementary tick_suspend_local() and modify tick_unfreeze() and tick_freeze(), respectively, to use the new local tick resume/suspend functions. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner [ Combined two patches, rebased, modified subject/changelog. ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Boris Ostrovsky Cc: David Vrabel Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1698741.eezk9tnXtG@vostro.rjw.lan [ Merged to latest timers/core. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/time/tick-common.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/time/tick-common.c') diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c index 1a60c2ae96a8..da796d65d1fb 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c @@ -374,40 +374,32 @@ void tick_shutdown(unsigned int *cpup) } /** - * tick_suspend - Suspend the tick and the broadcast device + * tick_suspend_local - Suspend the local tick device * - * Called from syscore_suspend() via timekeeping_suspend with only one - * CPU online and interrupts disabled or from tick_unfreeze() under - * tick_freeze_lock. + * Called from the local cpu for freeze with interrupts disabled. * * No locks required. Nothing can change the per cpu device. */ -void tick_suspend(void) +static void tick_suspend_local(void) { struct tick_device *td = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_device); clockevents_shutdown(td->evtdev); - tick_suspend_broadcast(); } /** - * tick_resume - Resume the tick and the broadcast device + * tick_resume_local - Resume the local tick device * - * Called from syscore_resume() via timekeeping_resume with only one - * CPU online and interrupts disabled or from tick_unfreeze() under - * tick_freeze_lock. + * Called from the local CPU for unfreeze or XEN resume magic. * * No locks required. Nothing can change the per cpu device. */ -void tick_resume(void) +void tick_resume_local(void) { - struct tick_device *td; - int broadcast; + struct tick_device *td = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_device); + bool broadcast = tick_resume_check_broadcast(); - broadcast = tick_resume_broadcast(); - td = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_device); clockevents_tick_resume(td->evtdev); - if (!broadcast) { if (td->mode == TICKDEV_MODE_PERIODIC) tick_setup_periodic(td->evtdev, 0); @@ -416,6 +408,35 @@ void tick_resume(void) } } +/** + * tick_suspend - Suspend the tick and the broadcast device + * + * Called from syscore_suspend() via timekeeping_suspend with only one + * CPU online and interrupts disabled or from tick_unfreeze() under + * tick_freeze_lock. + * + * No locks required. Nothing can change the per cpu device. + */ +void tick_suspend(void) +{ + tick_suspend_local(); + tick_suspend_broadcast(); +} + +/** + * tick_resume - Resume the tick and the broadcast device + * + * Called from syscore_resume() via timekeeping_resume with only one + * CPU online and interrupts disabled. + * + * No locks required. Nothing can change the per cpu device. + */ +void tick_resume(void) +{ + tick_resume_broadcast(); + tick_resume_local(); +} + static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(tick_freeze_lock); static unsigned int tick_freeze_depth; @@ -436,7 +457,7 @@ void tick_freeze(void) if (tick_freeze_depth == num_online_cpus()) { timekeeping_suspend(); } else { - tick_suspend(); + tick_suspend_local(); } raw_spin_unlock(&tick_freeze_lock); -- cgit v1.2.3 From 7270d11c56f594af4d166b2988421cd8ed933dc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:11:52 +0100 Subject: arm/bL_switcher: Kill tick suspend hackery Use the new tick_suspend/resume_local() and get rid of the homebrewn implementation of these in the ARM bL switcher. The check for the cpumask is completely pointless. There is no harm to suspend a per cpu tick device unconditionally. If that's a real issue then we fix it proper at the core level and not with some completely undocumented hacks in some random core code. Move the tick internals to the core code, now that this nuisance is gone. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner [ rjw: Rebase, changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Nicolas Pitre Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Russell King Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1655112.Ws17YsMfN7@vostro.rjw.lan Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/time/tick-common.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/time/tick-common.c') diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c index da796d65d1fb..e28ba5c044c5 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ void tick_shutdown(unsigned int *cpup) * * No locks required. Nothing can change the per cpu device. */ -static void tick_suspend_local(void) +void tick_suspend_local(void) { struct tick_device *td = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_device); -- cgit v1.2.3 From 52c063d1adbc16c76e70fffa20727fcd4e9343b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 02:37:24 +0200 Subject: clockevents: Make tick handover explicit clockevents_notify() is a leftover from the early design of the clockevents facility. It's really not a notification mechanism, it's a multiplex call. We are way better off to have explicit calls instead of this monstrosity. Split out the tick_handover call and invoke it explicitely from the hotplug code. Temporary solution will be cleaned up in later patches. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner [ Rebase ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: John Stultz Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andrew Morton Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1658173.RkEEILFiQZ@vostro.rjw.lan Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/time/tick-common.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/time/tick-common.c') diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c index e28ba5c044c5..055c868f3ec9 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c @@ -332,20 +332,23 @@ out_bc: tick_install_broadcast_device(newdev); } +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU /* * Transfer the do_timer job away from a dying cpu. * - * Called with interrupts disabled. + * Called with interrupts disabled. Not locking required. If + * tick_do_timer_cpu is owned by this cpu, nothing can change it. */ -void tick_handover_do_timer(int *cpup) +void tick_handover_do_timer(void) { - if (*cpup == tick_do_timer_cpu) { + if (tick_do_timer_cpu == smp_processor_id()) { int cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask); tick_do_timer_cpu = (cpu < nr_cpu_ids) ? cpu : TICK_DO_TIMER_NONE; } } +#endif /* * Shutdown an event device on a given cpu: -- cgit v1.2.3 From a49b116dcb1265f238f3169507424257b0519069 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 02:38:05 +0200 Subject: clockevents: Cleanup dead cpu explicitely clockevents_notify() is a leftover from the early design of the clockevents facility. It's really not a notification mechanism, it's a multiplex call. We are way better off to have explicit calls instead of this monstrosity. Split out the cleanup function for a dead cpu and invoke it directly from the cpu down code. Make it conditional on CPU_HOTPLUG as well. Temporary change, will be refined in the future. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner [ Rebased, added clockevents_notify() removal ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1735025.raBZdQHM3m@vostro.rjw.lan Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/time/tick-common.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/time/tick-common.c') diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c index 055c868f3ec9..fac3e98fec49 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c @@ -348,7 +348,6 @@ void tick_handover_do_timer(void) TICK_DO_TIMER_NONE; } } -#endif /* * Shutdown an event device on a given cpu: @@ -357,9 +356,9 @@ void tick_handover_do_timer(void) * access the hardware device itself. * We just set the mode and remove it from the lists. */ -void tick_shutdown(unsigned int *cpup) +void tick_shutdown(unsigned int cpu) { - struct tick_device *td = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_device, *cpup); + struct tick_device *td = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_device, cpu); struct clock_event_device *dev = td->evtdev; td->mode = TICKDEV_MODE_PERIODIC; @@ -375,6 +374,7 @@ void tick_shutdown(unsigned int *cpup) td->evtdev = NULL; } } +#endif /** * tick_suspend_local - Suspend the local tick device -- cgit v1.2.3 From 422fe7502e3f16dc1c680f22d31f59f022edc10d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 15:21:51 +0200 Subject: timers/PM: Fix up tick_unfreeze() A recent conflict resolution has left tick_resume() in tick_unfreeze() which leads to an unbalanced execution of tick_resume_broadcast() every time that function runs. Fix that by replacing the tick_resume() in tick_unfreeze() with tick_resume_local() as appropriate. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com Cc: david.vrabel@citrix.com Cc: konrad.wilk@oracle.com Cc: peterz@infradead.org Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/8099075.V0LvN3pQAV@vostro.rjw.lan Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/time/tick-common.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/time/tick-common.c') diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c index fac3e98fec49..ad66a51ca4fa 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ void tick_unfreeze(void) if (tick_freeze_depth == num_online_cpus()) timekeeping_resume(); else - tick_resume(); + tick_resume_local(); tick_freeze_depth--; -- cgit v1.2.3 From def747087e83aa5f6a71582cfa71e18341988688 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 15:31:32 +0200 Subject: timers/PM: Drop unnecessary braces from tick_freeze() Some braces in tick_freeze() are not necessary, so drop them. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: peterz@infradead.org Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1534128.H5hN3KBFB4@vostro.rjw.lan Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/time/tick-common.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/time/tick-common.c') diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c index ad66a51ca4fa..3ae6afa1eb98 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c @@ -457,11 +457,10 @@ void tick_freeze(void) raw_spin_lock(&tick_freeze_lock); tick_freeze_depth++; - if (tick_freeze_depth == num_online_cpus()) { + if (tick_freeze_depth == num_online_cpus()) timekeeping_suspend(); - } else { + else tick_suspend_local(); - } raw_spin_unlock(&tick_freeze_lock); } -- cgit v1.2.3