From a29d8b8e2d811a24bbe49215a0f0c536b72ebc18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:39:15 +0900 Subject: percpu: add __percpu sparse annotations to what's left Add __percpu sparse annotations to places which didn't make it in one of the previous patches. All converions are trivial. These annotations are to make sparse consider percpu variables to be in a different address space and warn if accessed without going through percpu accessors. This patch doesn't affect normal builds. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Acked-by: Borislav Petkov Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Huang Ying Cc: Len Brown Cc: Neil Brown --- drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c') diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c index 2cabadcc4d8c..8c6a6497d7f3 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c @@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ end: } int acpi_processor_preregister_performance( - struct acpi_processor_performance *performance) + struct acpi_processor_performance __percpu *performance) { int count, count_target; int retval = 0; -- cgit v1.2.3 From 455c0d71d46e86b0b7ff2c9dcfc19bc162302ee9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Darrick J. Wong" Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:28:20 -0800 Subject: ACPI: Fix regression where _PPC is not read at boot even when ignore_ppc=0 Earlier, Ingo Molnar posted a patch to make it so that the kernel would avoid reading _PPC on his broken T60. Unfortunately, it seems that with Thomas Renninger's patch last July to eliminate _PPC evaluations when the processor driver loads, the kernel never actually reads _PPC at all! This is problematic if you happen to boot your non-T60 computer in a state where the BIOS _wants_ _PPC to be something other than zero. So, put the _PPC evaluation back into acpi_processor_get_performance_info if ignore_ppc isn't 1. Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong Signed-off-by: Len Brown --- drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c') diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c index 2cabadcc4d8c..a959f6a07508 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c @@ -413,7 +413,11 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_performance_info(struct acpi_processor *pr) if (result) goto update_bios; - return 0; + /* We need to call _PPC once when cpufreq starts */ + if (ignore_ppc != 1) + result = acpi_processor_get_platform_limit(pr); + + return result; /* * Having _PPC but missing frequencies (_PSS, _PCT) is a very good hint that -- cgit v1.2.3