summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel (follow)
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
...
* bpf: convert htab map to hlist_nullsAlexei Starovoitov2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | commit 4fe8435909fddc97b81472026aa954e06dd192a5 upstream. when all map elements are pre-allocated one cpu can delete and reuse htab_elem while another cpu is still walking the hlist. In such case the lookup may miss the element. Convert hlist to hlist_nulls to avoid such scenario. When bucket lock is taken there is no need to take such precautions, so only convert map_lookup and map_get_next to nulls. The race window is extremely small and only reproducible with explicit udelay() inside lookup_nulls_elem_raw() Similar to hlist add hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_safe() and hlist_nulls_entry_safe() helpers. Fixes: 6c9059817432 ("bpf: pre-allocate hash map elements") Reported-by: Jonathan Perry <jonperry@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Chenbo Feng <fengc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: fix struct htab_elem layoutAlexei Starovoitov2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | commit 9f691549f76d488a0c74397b3e51e943865ea01f upstream. when htab_elem is removed from the bucket list the htab_elem.hash_node.next field should not be overridden too early otherwise we have a tiny race window between lookup and delete. The bug was discovered by manual code analysis and reproducible only with explicit udelay() in lookup_elem_raw(). Fixes: 6c9059817432 ("bpf: pre-allocate hash map elements") Reported-by: Jonathan Perry <jonperry@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Chenbo Feng <fengc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: check pending signals while verifying programsAlexei Starovoitov2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [ Upstream commit c3494801cd1785e2c25f1a5735fa19ddcf9665da ] Malicious user space may try to force the verifier to use as much cpu time and memory as possible. Hence check for pending signals while verifying the program. Note that suspend of sys_bpf(PROG_LOAD) syscall will lead to EAGAIN, since the kernel has to release the resources used for program verification. Reported-by: Anatoly Trosinenko <anatoly.trosinenko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: Prevent memory disambiguation attackAlexei Starovoitov2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | commit af86ca4e3088fe5eacf2f7e58c01fa68ca067672 upstream. Detect code patterns where malicious 'speculative store bypass' can be used and sanitize such patterns. 39: (bf) r3 = r10 40: (07) r3 += -216 41: (79) r8 = *(u64 *)(r7 +0) // slow read 42: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -72) = 0 // verifier inserts this instruction 43: (7b) *(u64 *)(r8 +0) = r3 // this store becomes slow due to r8 44: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r6 +0) // cpu speculatively executes this load 45: (71) r2 = *(u8 *)(r1 +0) // speculatively arbitrary 'load byte' // is now sanitized Above code after x86 JIT becomes: e5: mov %rbp,%rdx e8: add $0xffffffffffffff28,%rdx ef: mov 0x0(%r13),%r14 f3: movq $0x0,-0x48(%rbp) fb: mov %rdx,0x0(%r14) ff: mov 0x0(%rbx),%rdi 103: movzbq 0x0(%rdi),%rsi Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> [bwh: Backported to 4.9: - Add bpf_verifier_env parameter to check_stack_write() - Look up stack slot_types with state->stack_slot_type[] rather than state->stack[].slot_type[] - Drop bpf_verifier_env argument to verbose() - Adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf/verifier: Pass instruction index to check_mem_access() and check_xadd()Ben Hutchings2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | Extracted from commit 31fd85816dbe "bpf: permits narrower load from bpf program context fields". Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf/verifier: Add spi variable to check_stack_write()Ben Hutchings2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | Extracted from commit dc503a8ad984 "bpf/verifier: track liveness for pruning". Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: fix references to free_bpf_prog_info() in commentsJakub Kicinski2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [ Upstream commit ab7f5bf0928be2f148d000a6eaa6c0a36e74750e ] Comments in the verifier refer to free_bpf_prog_info() which seems to have never existed in tree. Replace it with free_used_maps(). Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: map_get_next_key to return first key on NULLTeng Qin2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | commit 8fe45924387be6b5c1be59a7eb330790c61d5d10 upstream. When iterating through a map, we need to find a key that does not exist in the map so map_get_next_key will give us the first key of the map. This often requires a lot of guessing in production systems. This patch makes map_get_next_key return the first key when the key pointer in the parameter is NULL. Signed-off-by: Teng Qin <qinteng@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Chenbo Feng <fengc@google.com> Cc: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: skip unnecessary capability checkChenbo Feng2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | commit 0fa4fe85f4724fff89b09741c437cbee9cf8b008 upstream. The current check statement in BPF syscall will do a capability check for CAP_SYS_ADMIN before checking sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled. This code path will trigger unnecessary security hooks on capability checking and cause false alarms on unprivileged process trying to get CAP_SYS_ADMIN access. This can be resolved by simply switch the order of the statement and CAP_SYS_ADMIN is not required anyway if unprivileged bpf syscall is allowed. Signed-off-by: Chenbo Feng <fengc@google.com> Acked-by: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* BACKPORT: fix "netfilter: xt_bpf: Fix XT_BPF_MODE_FD_PINNED mode of ↵Al Viro2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 'xt_bpf_info_v1'" Descriptor table is a shared object; it's not a place where you can stick temporary references to files, especially when we don't need an opened file at all. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.14 Fixes: 98589a0998b8 ("netfilter: xt_bpf: Fix XT_BPF_MODE_FD_PINNED mode of 'xt_bpf_info_v1'") Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Chenbo Feng <fengc@google.com> Removed the code related to function bpf_prog_get_ok() since it is not exsit in current android tree. (cherry picked from commit 040ee69226f8a96b7943645d68f41d5d44b5ff7d) Change-Id: If7a602128cdea4b4b50c8effb215c9bca7449515 Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* UPSTREAM: netfilter: xt_bpf: Fix XT_BPF_MODE_FD_PINNED mode of 'xt_bpf_info_v1'Shmulik Ladkani2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 2c16d6033264 ("netfilter: xt_bpf: support ebpf") introduced support for attaching an eBPF object by an fd, with the 'bpf_mt_check_v1' ABI expecting the '.fd' to be specified upon each IPT_SO_SET_REPLACE call. However this breaks subsequent iptables calls: # iptables -A INPUT -m bpf --object-pinned /sys/fs/bpf/xxx -j ACCEPT # iptables -A INPUT -s 5.6.7.8 -j ACCEPT iptables: Invalid argument. Run `dmesg' for more information. That's because iptables works by loading existing rules using IPT_SO_GET_ENTRIES to userspace, then issuing IPT_SO_SET_REPLACE with the replacement set. However, the loaded 'xt_bpf_info_v1' has an arbitrary '.fd' number (from the initial "iptables -m bpf" invocation) - so when 2nd invocation occurs, userspace passes a bogus fd number, which leads to 'bpf_mt_check_v1' to fail. One suggested solution [1] was to hack iptables userspace, to perform a "entries fixup" immediatley after IPT_SO_GET_ENTRIES, by opening a new, process-local fd per every 'xt_bpf_info_v1' entry seen. However, in [2] both Pablo Neira Ayuso and Willem de Bruijn suggested to depricate the xt_bpf_info_v1 ABI dealing with pinned ebpf objects. This fix changes the XT_BPF_MODE_FD_PINNED behavior to ignore the given '.fd' and instead perform an in-kernel lookup for the bpf object given the provided '.path'. It also defines an alias for the XT_BPF_MODE_FD_PINNED mode, named XT_BPF_MODE_PATH_PINNED, to better reflect the fact that the user is expected to provide the path of the pinned object. Existing XT_BPF_MODE_FD_ELF behavior (non-pinned fd mode) is preserved. References: [1] https://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=150564724607440&w=2 [2] https://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=150575727129880&w=2 Reported-by: Rafael Buchbinder <rafi@rbk.ms> Signed-off-by: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com> Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> Signed-off-by: Chenbo Feng <fengc@google.com> (cherry picked from commit 98589a0998b8b13c4a8fa1ccb0e62751a019faa5) Change-Id: Ia0d15a76823cca3afb38786a3d2c25c13ccf941d Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* perf, bpf: add perf events core support for BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT programsAlexei Starovoitov2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Allow attaching BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT programs to sw and hw perf events via overflow_handler mechanism. When program is attached the overflow_handlers become stacked. The program acts as a filter. Returning zero from the program means that the normal perf_event_output handler will not be called and sampling event won't be stored in the ring buffer. The overflow_handler_context==NULL is an additional safety check to make sure programs are not attached to hw breakpoints and watchdog in case other checks (that prevent that now anyway) get accidentally relaxed in the future. The program refcnt is incremented in case perf_events are inhereted when target task is forked. Similar to kprobe and tracepoint programs there is no ioctl to detach the program or swap already attached program. The user space expected to close(perf_event_fd) like it does right now for kprobe+bpf. That restriction simplifies the code quite a bit. The invocation of overflow_handler in __perf_event_overflow() is now done via READ_ONCE, since that pointer can be replaced when the program is attached while perf_event itself could have been active already. There is no need to do similar treatment for event->prog, since it's assigned only once before it's accessed. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* perf/core: Set event's default ::overflow_handler()Wang Nan2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Set a default event->overflow_handler in perf_event_alloc() so don't need to check event->overflow_handler in __perf_event_overflow(). Following commits can give a different default overflow_handler. Initial idea comes from Peter: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130708121557.GA17211@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net Since the default value of event->overflow_handler is not NULL, existing 'if (!overflow_handler)' checks need to be changed. is_default_overflow_handler() is introduced for this. No extra performance overhead is introduced into the hot path because in the original code we still need to read this handler from memory. A conditional branch is avoided so actually we remove some instructions. Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: <pi3orama@163.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com> Cc: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1459147292-239310-3-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: add schedule points in percpu arrays managementEric Dumazet2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [ upstream commit 32fff239de37ef226d5b66329dd133f64d63b22d ] syszbot managed to trigger RCU detected stalls in bpf_array_free_percpu() It takes time to allocate a huge percpu map, but even more time to free it. Since we run in process context, use cond_resched() to yield cpu if needed. Fixes: a10423b87a7e ("bpf: introduce BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY map") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: fix mlock precharge on arraymapsDaniel Borkmann2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [ upstream commit 9c2d63b843a5c8a8d0559cc067b5398aa5ec3ffc ] syzkaller recently triggered OOM during percpu map allocation; while there is work in progress by Dennis Zhou to add __GFP_NORETRY semantics for percpu allocator under pressure, there seems also a missing bpf_map_precharge_memlock() check in array map allocation. Given today the actual bpf_map_charge_memlock() happens after the find_and_alloc_map() in syscall path, the bpf_map_precharge_memlock() is there to bail out early before we go and do the map setup work when we find that we hit the limits anyway. Therefore add this for array map as well. Fixes: 6c9059817432 ("bpf: pre-allocate hash map elements") Fixes: a10423b87a7e ("bpf: introduce BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY map") Reported-by: syzbot+adb03f3f0bb57ce3acda@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennisszhou@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: fix wrong exposure of map_flags into fdinfo for lpmDaniel Borkmann2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [ upstream commit a316338cb71a3260201490e615f2f6d5c0d8fb2c ] trie_alloc() always needs to have BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC passed in via attr->map_flags, since it does not support preallocation yet. We check the flag, but we never copy the flag into trie->map.map_flags, which is later on exposed into fdinfo and used by loaders such as iproute2. Latter uses this in bpf_map_selfcheck_pinned() to test whether a pinned map has the same spec as the one from the BPF obj file and if not, bails out, which is currently the case for lpm since it exposes always 0 as flags. Also copy over flags in array_map_alloc() and stack_map_alloc(). They always have to be 0 right now, but we should make sure to not miss to copy them over at a later point in time when we add actual flags for them to use. Fixes: b95a5c4db09b ("bpf: add a longest prefix match trie map implementation") Reported-by: Jarno Rajahalme <jarno@covalent.io> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: fix function type for __bpf_prog_runSami Tolvanen2022-04-19
| | | | | | | Bug: 67506682 Change-Id: I096a470c65a2a1867c51da9a33843ae23bf5e547 Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: reject stores into ctx via st and xaddDaniel Borkmann2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [ upstream commit f37a8cb84cce18762e8f86a70bd6a49a66ab964c ] Alexei found that verifier does not reject stores into context via BPF_ST instead of BPF_STX. And while looking at it, we also should not allow XADD variant of BPF_STX. The context rewriter is only assuming either BPF_LDX_MEM- or BPF_STX_MEM-type operations, thus reject anything other than that so that assumptions in the rewriter properly hold. Add test cases as well for BPF selftests. Fixes: d691f9e8d440 ("bpf: allow programs to write to certain skb fields") Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: fix 32-bit divide by zeroAlexei Starovoitov2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [ upstream commit 68fda450a7df51cff9e5a4d4a4d9d0d5f2589153 ] due to some JITs doing if (src_reg == 0) check in 64-bit mode for div/mod operations mask upper 32-bits of src register before doing the check Fixes: 622582786c9e ("net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT") Fixes: 7a12b5031c6b ("sparc64: Add eBPF JIT.") Reported-by: syzbot+48340bb518e88849e2e3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: fix divides by zeroEric Dumazet2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [ upstream commit c366287ebd698ef5e3de300d90cd62ee9ee7373e ] Divides by zero are not nice, lets avoid them if possible. Also do_div() seems not needed when dealing with 32bit operands, but this seems a minor detail. Fixes: bd4cf0ed331a ("net: filter: rework/optimize internal BPF interpreter's instruction set") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: arsh is not supported in 32 bit alu thus reject itDaniel Borkmann2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [ upstream commit 7891a87efc7116590eaba57acc3c422487802c6f ] The following snippet was throwing an 'unknown opcode cc' warning in BPF interpreter: 0: (18) r0 = 0x0 2: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r0 3: (cc) (u32) r0 s>>= (u32) r0 4: (95) exit Although a number of JITs do support BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH | BPF_{K,X} generation, not all of them do and interpreter does neither. We can leave existing ones and implement it later in bpf-next for the remaining ones, but reject this properly in verifier for the time being. Fixes: 17a5267067f3 ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)") Reported-by: syzbot+93c4904c5c70348a6890@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: introduce BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON configAlexei Starovoitov2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [ upstream commit 290af86629b25ffd1ed6232c4e9107da031705cb ] The BPF interpreter has been used as part of the spectre 2 attack CVE-2017-5715. A quote from goolge project zero blog: "At this point, it would normally be necessary to locate gadgets in the host kernel code that can be used to actually leak data by reading from an attacker-controlled location, shifting and masking the result appropriately and then using the result of that as offset to an attacker-controlled address for a load. But piecing gadgets together and figuring out which ones work in a speculation context seems annoying. So instead, we decided to use the eBPF interpreter, which is built into the host kernel - while there is no legitimate way to invoke it from inside a VM, the presence of the code in the host kernel's text section is sufficient to make it usable for the attack, just like with ordinary ROP gadgets." To make attacker job harder introduce BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON config option that removes interpreter from the kernel in favor of JIT-only mode. So far eBPF JIT is supported by: x64, arm64, arm32, sparc64, s390, powerpc64, mips64 The start of JITed program is randomized and code page is marked as read-only. In addition "constant blinding" can be turned on with net.core.bpf_jit_harden v2->v3: - move __bpf_prog_ret0 under ifdef (Daniel) v1->v2: - fix init order, test_bpf and cBPF (Daniel's feedback) - fix offloaded bpf (Jakub's feedback) - add 'return 0' dummy in case something can invoke prog->bpf_func - retarget bpf tree. For bpf-next the patch would need one extra hunk. It will be sent when the trees are merged back to net-next Considered doing: int bpf_jit_enable __read_mostly = BPF_EBPF_JIT_DEFAULT; but it seems better to land the patch as-is and in bpf-next remove bpf_jit_enable global variable from all JITs, consolidate in one place and remove this jit_init() function. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: fix bpf_tail_call() x64 JITAlexei Starovoitov2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [ upstream commit 90caccdd8cc0215705f18b92771b449b01e2474a ] - bpf prog_array just like all other types of bpf array accepts 32-bit index. Clarify that in the comment. - fix x64 JIT of bpf_tail_call which was incorrectly loading 8 instead of 4 bytes - tighten corresponding check in the interpreter to stay consistent The JIT bug can be triggered after introduction of BPF_F_NUMA_NODE flag in commit 96eabe7a40aa in 4.14. Before that the map_flags would stay zero and though JIT code is wrong it will check bounds correctly. Hence two fixes tags. All other JITs don't have this problem. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Fixes: 96eabe7a40aa ("bpf: Allow selecting numa node during map creation") Fixes: b52f00e6a715 ("x86: bpf_jit: implement bpf_tail_call() helper") Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf, array: fix overflow in max_entries and undefined behavior in index_maskDaniel Borkmann2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | commit bbeb6e4323dad9b5e0ee9f60c223dd532e2403b1 upstream. syzkaller tried to alloc a map with 0xfffffffd entries out of a userns, and thus unprivileged. With the recently added logic in b2157399cc98 ("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation") we round this up to the next power of two value for max_entries for unprivileged such that we can apply proper masking into potentially zeroed out map slots. However, this will generate an index_mask of 0xffffffff, and therefore a + 1 will let this overflow into new max_entries of 0. This will pass allocation, etc, and later on map access we still enforce on the original attr->max_entries value which was 0xfffffffd, therefore triggering GPF all over the place. Thus bail out on overflow in such case. Moreover, on 32 bit archs roundup_pow_of_two() can also not be used, since fls_long(max_entries - 1) can result in 32 and 1UL << 32 in 32 bit space is undefined. Therefore, do this by hand in a 64 bit variable. This fixes all the issues triggered by syzkaller's reproducers. Fixes: b2157399cc98 ("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation") Reported-by: syzbot+b0efb8e572d01bce1ae0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+6c15e9744f75f2364773@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+d2f5524fb46fd3b312ee@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+61d23c95395cc90dbc2b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+0d363c942452cca68c01@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculationAlexei Starovoitov2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | commit b2157399cc9898260d6031c5bfe45fe137c1fbe7 upstream. Under speculation, CPUs may mis-predict branches in bounds checks. Thus, memory accesses under a bounds check may be speculated even if the bounds check fails, providing a primitive for building a side channel. To avoid leaking kernel data round up array-based maps and mask the index after bounds check, so speculated load with out of bounds index will load either valid value from the array or zero from the padded area. Unconditionally mask index for all array types even when max_entries are not rounded to power of 2 for root user. When map is created by unpriv user generate a sequence of bpf insns that includes AND operation to make sure that JITed code includes the same 'index & index_mask' operation. If prog_array map is created by unpriv user replace bpf_tail_call(ctx, map, index); with if (index >= max_entries) { index &= map->index_mask; bpf_tail_call(ctx, map, index); } (along with roundup to power 2) to prevent out-of-bounds speculation. There is secondary redundant 'if (index >= max_entries)' in the interpreter and in all JITs, but they can be optimized later if necessary. Other array-like maps (cpumap, devmap, sockmap, perf_event_array, cgroup_array) cannot be used by unpriv, so no changes there. That fixes bpf side of "Variant 1: bounds check bypass (CVE-2017-5753)" on all architectures with and without JIT. v2->v3: Daniel noticed that attack potentially can be crafted via syscall commands without loading the program, so add masking to those paths as well. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> [ Backported to 4.9 - gregkh ] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: refactor fixup_bpf_calls()Alexei Starovoitov2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | commit 79741b3bdec01a8628368fbcfccc7d189ed606cb upstream. reduce indent and make it iterate over instructions similar to convert_ctx_accesses(). Also convert hard BUG_ON into soft verifier error. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> [Backported to 4.9.y - gregkh] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: move fixup_bpf_calls() functionAlexei Starovoitov2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | commit e245c5c6a5656e4d61aa7bb08e9694fd6e5b2b9d upstream. no functional change. move fixup_bpf_calls() to verifier.c it's being refactored in the next patch Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> [backported to 4.9 - gregkh] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf/verifier: Fix states_equal() comparison of pointer and UNKNOWNBen Hutchings2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | An UNKNOWN_VALUE is not supposed to be derived from a pointer, unless pointer leaks are allowed. Therefore, states_equal() must not treat a state with a pointer in a register as "equal" to a state with an UNKNOWN_VALUE in that register. This was fixed differently upstream, but the code around here was largely rewritten in 4.14 by commit f1174f77b50c "bpf/verifier: rework value tracking". The bug can be detected by the bpf/verifier sub-test "pointer/scalar confusion in state equality check (way 1)". Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> Cc: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: fix incorrect sign extension in check_alu_op()Jann Horn2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [ Upstream commit 95a762e2c8c942780948091f8f2a4f32fce1ac6f ] Distinguish between BPF_ALU64|BPF_MOV|BPF_K (load 32-bit immediate, sign-extended to 64-bit) and BPF_ALU|BPF_MOV|BPF_K (load 32-bit immediate, zero-padded to 64-bit); only perform sign extension in the first case. Starting with v4.14, this is exploitable by unprivileged users as long as the unprivileged_bpf_disabled sysctl isn't set. Debian assigned CVE-2017-16995 for this issue. v3: - add CVE number (Ben Hutchings) Fixes: 484611357c19 ("bpf: allow access into map value arrays") Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: reject out-of-bounds stack pointer calculationJann Horn2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Reject programs that compute wildly out-of-bounds stack pointers. Otherwise, pointers can be computed with an offset that doesn't fit into an `int`, causing security issues in the stack memory access check (as well as signed integer overflow during offset addition). This is a fix specifically for the v4.9 stable tree because the mainline code looks very different at this point. Fixes: 7bca0a9702edf ("bpf: enhance verifier to understand stack pointer arithmetic") Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: fix branch pruning logicAlexei Starovoitov2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [ Upstream commit c131187db2d3fa2f8bf32fdf4e9a4ef805168467 ] when the verifier detects that register contains a runtime constant and it's compared with another constant it will prune exploration of the branch that is guaranteed not to be taken at runtime. This is all correct, but malicious program may be constructed in such a way that it always has a constant comparison and the other branch is never taken under any conditions. In this case such path through the program will not be explored by the verifier. It won't be taken at run-time either, but since all instructions are JITed the malicious program may cause JITs to complain about using reserved fields, etc. To fix the issue we have to track the instructions explored by the verifier and sanitize instructions that are dead at run time with NOPs. We cannot reject such dead code, since llvm generates it for valid C code, since it doesn't do as much data flow analysis as the verifier does. Fixes: 17a5267067f3 ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)") Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: adjust insn_aux_data when patching insnsAlexei Starovoitov2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [ Upstream commit 8041902dae5299c1f194ba42d14383f734631009 ] convert_ctx_accesses() replaces single bpf instruction with a set of instructions. Adjust corresponding insn_aux_data while patching. It's needed to make sure subsequent 'for(all insn)' loops have matching insn and insn_aux_data. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: fix lockdep splatEric Dumazet2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [ Upstream commit 89ad2fa3f043a1e8daae193bcb5fe34d5f8caf28 ] pcpu_freelist_pop() needs the same lockdep awareness than pcpu_freelist_populate() to avoid a false positive. [ INFO: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected ] switchto-defaul/12508 [HC0[0]:SC0[6]:HE0:SE0] is trying to acquire: (&htab->buckets[i].lock){......}, at: [<ffffffff9dc099cb>] __htab_percpu_map_update_elem+0x1cb/0x300 and this task is already holding: (dev_queue->dev->qdisc_class ?: &qdisc_tx_lock#2){+.-...}, at: [<ffffffff9e135848>] __dev_queue_xmit+0 x868/0x1240 which would create a new lock dependency: (dev_queue->dev->qdisc_class ?: &qdisc_tx_lock#2){+.-...} -> (&htab->buckets[i].lock){......} but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock: (dev_queue->dev->qdisc_class ?: &qdisc_tx_lock#2){+.-...} ... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-safe at: [<ffffffff9db5931b>] __lock_acquire+0x42b/0x1f10 [<ffffffff9db5b32c>] lock_acquire+0xbc/0x1b0 [<ffffffff9da05e38>] _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x50 [<ffffffff9e135848>] __dev_queue_xmit+0x868/0x1240 [<ffffffff9e136240>] dev_queue_xmit+0x10/0x20 [<ffffffff9e1965d9>] ip_finish_output2+0x439/0x590 [<ffffffff9e197410>] ip_finish_output+0x150/0x2f0 [<ffffffff9e19886d>] ip_output+0x7d/0x260 [<ffffffff9e19789e>] ip_local_out+0x5e/0xe0 [<ffffffff9e197b25>] ip_queue_xmit+0x205/0x620 [<ffffffff9e1b8398>] tcp_transmit_skb+0x5a8/0xcb0 [<ffffffff9e1ba152>] tcp_write_xmit+0x242/0x1070 [<ffffffff9e1baffc>] __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x3c/0xf0 [<ffffffff9e1b3472>] tcp_rcv_established+0x312/0x700 [<ffffffff9e1c1acc>] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x11c/0x200 [<ffffffff9e1c3dc2>] tcp_v4_rcv+0xaa2/0xc30 [<ffffffff9e191107>] ip_local_deliver_finish+0xa7/0x240 [<ffffffff9e191a36>] ip_local_deliver+0x66/0x200 [<ffffffff9e19137d>] ip_rcv_finish+0xdd/0x560 [<ffffffff9e191e65>] ip_rcv+0x295/0x510 [<ffffffff9e12ff88>] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x988/0x1020 [<ffffffff9e130641>] __netif_receive_skb+0x21/0x70 [<ffffffff9e1306ff>] process_backlog+0x6f/0x230 [<ffffffff9e132129>] net_rx_action+0x229/0x420 [<ffffffff9da07ee8>] __do_softirq+0xd8/0x43d [<ffffffff9e282bcc>] do_softirq_own_stack+0x1c/0x30 [<ffffffff9dafc2f5>] do_softirq+0x55/0x60 [<ffffffff9dafc3a8>] __local_bh_enable_ip+0xa8/0xb0 [<ffffffff9db4c727>] cpu_startup_entry+0x1c7/0x500 [<ffffffff9daab333>] start_secondary+0x113/0x140 to a SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: (&head->lock){+.+...} ... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe at: ... [<ffffffff9db5971f>] __lock_acquire+0x82f/0x1f10 [<ffffffff9db5b32c>] lock_acquire+0xbc/0x1b0 [<ffffffff9da05e38>] _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x50 [<ffffffff9dc0b7fa>] pcpu_freelist_pop+0x7a/0xb0 [<ffffffff9dc08b2c>] htab_map_alloc+0x50c/0x5f0 [<ffffffff9dc00dc5>] SyS_bpf+0x265/0x1200 [<ffffffff9e28195f>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x17 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: dev_queue->dev->qdisc_class ?: &qdisc_tx_lock#2 --> &htab->buckets[i].lock --> &head->lock Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&head->lock); local_irq_disable(); lock(dev_queue->dev->qdisc_class ?: &qdisc_tx_lock#2); lock(&htab->buckets[i].lock); <Interrupt> lock(dev_queue->dev->qdisc_class ?: &qdisc_tx_lock#2); *** DEADLOCK *** Fixes: e19494edab82 ("bpf: introduce percpu_freelist") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* UPSTREAM: selinux: bpf: Add addtional check for bpf object file receiveChenbo Feng2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Introduce a bpf object related check when sending and receiving files through unix domain socket as well as binder. It checks if the receiving process have privilege to read/write the bpf map or use the bpf program. This check is necessary because the bpf maps and programs are using a anonymous inode as their shared inode so the normal way of checking the files and sockets when passing between processes cannot work properly on eBPF object. This check only works when the BPF_SYSCALL is configured. Signed-off-by: Chenbo Feng <fengc@google.com> Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> Reviewed-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> (cherry-pick from net-next: f66e448cfda021b0bcd884f26709796fe19c7cc1) Bug: 30950746 Change-Id: I5b2cf4ccb4eab7eda91ddd7091d6aa3e7ed9f2cd Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* BACKPORT: security: bpf: Add LSM hooks for bpf object related syscallChenbo Feng2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Introduce several LSM hooks for the syscalls that will allow the userspace to access to eBPF object such as eBPF programs and eBPF maps. The security check is aimed to enforce a per object security protection for eBPF object so only processes with the right priviliges can read/write to a specific map or use a specific eBPF program. Besides that, a general security hook is added before the multiplexer of bpf syscall to check the cmd and the attribute used for the command. The actual security module can decide which command need to be checked and how the cmd should be checked. Signed-off-by: Chenbo Feng <fengc@google.com> Acked-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Added the LIST_HEAD_INIT call for security hooks, it nolonger exist in uptream code. (cherry-pick from net-next: afdb09c720b62b8090584c11151d856df330e57d) Bug: 30950746 Change-Id: Ieb3ac74392f531735fc7c949b83346a5f587a77b Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* BACKPORT: bpf: Add file mode configuration into bpf mapsChenbo Feng2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Introduce the map read/write flags to the eBPF syscalls that returns the map fd. The flags is used to set up the file mode when construct a new file descriptor for bpf maps. To not break the backward capability, the f_flags is set to O_RDWR if the flag passed by syscall is 0. Otherwise it should be O_RDONLY or O_WRONLY. When the userspace want to modify or read the map content, it will check the file mode to see if it is allowed to make the change. Signed-off-by: Chenbo Feng <fengc@google.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Deleted the file mode configuration code in unsupported map type and removed the file mode check in non-existing helper functions. (cherry-pick from net-next: 6e71b04a82248ccf13a94b85cbc674a9fefe53f5) Bug: 30950746 Change-Id: Icfad20f1abb77f91068d244fb0d87fa40824dd1b Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: move bpf_map_show_fdinfo to match upstream locationAnay Wadhera2022-04-19
| | | | Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf/verifier: reject BPF_ALU64|BPF_ENDEdward Cree2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [ Upstream commit e67b8a685c7c984e834e3181ef4619cd7025a136 ] Neither ___bpf_prog_run nor the JITs accept it. Also adds a new test case. Fixes: 17a5267067f3 ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)") Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf/verifier: fix min/max handling in BPF_SUBEdward Cree2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | [ Upstream commit 9305706c2e808ae59f1eb201867f82f1ddf6d7a6 ] We have to subtract the src max from the dst min, and vice-versa, since (e.g.) the smallest result comes from the largest subtrahend. Fixes: 484611357c19 ("bpf: allow access into map value arrays") Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: fix mixed signed/unsigned derived min/max value boundsDaniel Borkmann2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [ Upstream commit 4cabc5b186b5427b9ee5a7495172542af105f02b ] Edward reported that there's an issue in min/max value bounds tracking when signed and unsigned compares both provide hints on limits when having unknown variables. E.g. a program such as the following should have been rejected: 0: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = 0 1: (bf) r2 = r10 2: (07) r2 += -8 3: (18) r1 = 0xffff8a94cda93400 5: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1 6: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+7 R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R10=fp 7: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = -8 8: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -16) 9: (b7) r2 = -1 10: (2d) if r1 > r2 goto pc+3 R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R1=inv,min_value=0 R2=imm-1,max_value=18446744073709551615,min_align=1 R10=fp 11: (65) if r1 s> 0x1 goto pc+2 R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R1=inv,min_value=0,max_value=1 R2=imm-1,max_value=18446744073709551615,min_align=1 R10=fp 12: (0f) r0 += r1 13: (72) *(u8 *)(r0 +0) = 0 R0=map_value_adj(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=1 R1=inv,min_value=0,max_value=1 R2=imm-1,max_value=18446744073709551615,min_align=1 R10=fp 14: (b7) r0 = 0 15: (95) exit What happens is that in the first part ... 8: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -16) 9: (b7) r2 = -1 10: (2d) if r1 > r2 goto pc+3 ... r1 carries an unsigned value, and is compared as unsigned against a register carrying an immediate. Verifier deduces in reg_set_min_max() that since the compare is unsigned and operation is greater than (>), that in the fall-through/false case, r1's minimum bound must be 0 and maximum bound must be r2. Latter is larger than the bound and thus max value is reset back to being 'invalid' aka BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE. Thus, r1 state is now 'R1=inv,min_value=0'. The subsequent test ... 11: (65) if r1 s> 0x1 goto pc+2 ... is a signed compare of r1 with immediate value 1. Here, verifier deduces in reg_set_min_max() that since the compare is signed this time and operation is greater than (>), that in the fall-through/false case, we can deduce that r1's maximum bound must be 1, meaning with prior test, we result in r1 having the following state: R1=inv,min_value=0,max_value=1. Given that the actual value this holds is -8, the bounds are wrongly deduced. When this is being added to r0 which holds the map_value(_adj) type, then subsequent store access in above case will go through check_mem_access() which invokes check_map_access_adj(), that will then probe whether the map memory is in bounds based on the min_value and max_value as well as access size since the actual unknown value is min_value <= x <= max_value; commit fce366a9dd0d ("bpf, verifier: fix alu ops against map_value{, _adj} register types") provides some more explanation on the semantics. It's worth to note in this context that in the current code, min_value and max_value tracking are used for two things, i) dynamic map value access via check_map_access_adj() and since commit 06c1c049721a ("bpf: allow helpers access to variable memory") ii) also enforced at check_helper_mem_access() when passing a memory address (pointer to packet, map value, stack) and length pair to a helper and the length in this case is an unknown value defining an access range through min_value/max_value in that case. The min_value/max_value tracking is /not/ used in the direct packet access case to track ranges. However, the issue also affects case ii), for example, the following crafted program based on the same principle must be rejected as well: 0: (b7) r2 = 0 1: (bf) r3 = r10 2: (07) r3 += -512 3: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = -8 4: (79) r4 = *(u64 *)(r10 -16) 5: (b7) r6 = -1 6: (2d) if r4 > r6 goto pc+5 R1=ctx R2=imm0,min_value=0,max_value=0,min_align=2147483648 R3=fp-512 R4=inv,min_value=0 R6=imm-1,max_value=18446744073709551615,min_align=1 R10=fp 7: (65) if r4 s> 0x1 goto pc+4 R1=ctx R2=imm0,min_value=0,max_value=0,min_align=2147483648 R3=fp-512 R4=inv,min_value=0,max_value=1 R6=imm-1,max_value=18446744073709551615,min_align=1 R10=fp 8: (07) r4 += 1 9: (b7) r5 = 0 10: (6a) *(u16 *)(r10 -512) = 0 11: (85) call bpf_skb_load_bytes#26 12: (b7) r0 = 0 13: (95) exit Meaning, while we initialize the max_value stack slot that the verifier thinks we access in the [1,2] range, in reality we pass -7 as length which is interpreted as u32 in the helper. Thus, this issue is relevant also for the case of helper ranges. Resetting both bounds in check_reg_overflow() in case only one of them exceeds limits is also not enough as similar test can be created that uses values which are within range, thus also here learned min value in r1 is incorrect when mixed with later signed test to create a range: 0: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = 0 1: (bf) r2 = r10 2: (07) r2 += -8 3: (18) r1 = 0xffff880ad081fa00 5: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1 6: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+7 R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R10=fp 7: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = -8 8: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -16) 9: (b7) r2 = 2 10: (3d) if r2 >= r1 goto pc+3 R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R1=inv,min_value=3 R2=imm2,min_value=2,max_value=2,min_align=2 R10=fp 11: (65) if r1 s> 0x4 goto pc+2 R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R1=inv,min_value=3,max_value=4 R2=imm2,min_value=2,max_value=2,min_align=2 R10=fp 12: (0f) r0 += r1 13: (72) *(u8 *)(r0 +0) = 0 R0=map_value_adj(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=3,max_value=4 R1=inv,min_value=3,max_value=4 R2=imm2,min_value=2,max_value=2,min_align=2 R10=fp 14: (b7) r0 = 0 15: (95) exit This leaves us with two options for fixing this: i) to invalidate all prior learned information once we switch signed context, ii) to track min/max signed and unsigned boundaries separately as done in [0]. (Given latter introduces major changes throughout the whole verifier, it's rather net-next material, thus this patch follows option i), meaning we can derive bounds either from only signed tests or only unsigned tests.) There is still the case of adjust_reg_min_max_vals(), where we adjust bounds on ALU operations, meaning programs like the following where boundaries on the reg get mixed in context later on when bounds are merged on the dst reg must get rejected, too: 0: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = 0 1: (bf) r2 = r10 2: (07) r2 += -8 3: (18) r1 = 0xffff89b2bf87ce00 5: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1 6: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+6 R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R10=fp 7: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = -8 8: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -16) 9: (b7) r2 = 2 10: (3d) if r2 >= r1 goto pc+2 R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R1=inv,min_value=3 R2=imm2,min_value=2,max_value=2,min_align=2 R10=fp 11: (b7) r7 = 1 12: (65) if r7 s> 0x0 goto pc+2 R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R1=inv,min_value=3 R2=imm2,min_value=2,max_value=2,min_align=2 R7=imm1,max_value=0 R10=fp 13: (b7) r0 = 0 14: (95) exit from 12 to 15: R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R1=inv,min_value=3 R2=imm2,min_value=2,max_value=2,min_align=2 R7=imm1,min_value=1 R10=fp 15: (0f) r7 += r1 16: (65) if r7 s> 0x4 goto pc+2 R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R1=inv,min_value=3 R2=imm2,min_value=2,max_value=2,min_align=2 R7=inv,min_value=4,max_value=4 R10=fp 17: (0f) r0 += r7 18: (72) *(u8 *)(r0 +0) = 0 R0=map_value_adj(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=4,max_value=4 R1=inv,min_value=3 R2=imm2,min_value=2,max_value=2,min_align=2 R7=inv,min_value=4,max_value=4 R10=fp 19: (b7) r0 = 0 20: (95) exit Meaning, in adjust_reg_min_max_vals() we must also reset range values on the dst when src/dst registers have mixed signed/ unsigned derived min/max value bounds with one unbounded value as otherwise they can be added together deducing false boundaries. Once both boundaries are established from either ALU ops or compare operations w/o mixing signed/unsigned insns, then they can safely be added to other regs also having both boundaries established. Adding regs with one unbounded side to a map value where the bounded side has been learned w/o mixing ops is possible, but the resulting map value won't recover from that, meaning such op is considered invalid on the time of actual access. Invalid bounds are set on the dst reg in case i) src reg, or ii) in case dst reg already had them. The only way to recover would be to perform i) ALU ops but only 'add' is allowed on map value types or ii) comparisons, but these are disallowed on pointers in case they span a range. This is fine as only BPF_JEQ and BPF_JNE may be performed on PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL registers which potentially turn them into PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE type depending on the branch, so only here min/max value cannot be invalidated for them. In terms of state pruning, value_from_signed is considered as well in states_equal() when dealing with adjusted map values. With regards to breaking existing programs, there is a small risk, but use-cases are rather quite narrow where this could occur and mixing compares probably unlikely. Joint work with Josef and Edward. [0] https://lists.iovisor.org/pipermail/iovisor-dev/2017-June/000822.html Fixes: 484611357c19 ("bpf: allow access into map value arrays") Reported-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf, verifier: fix alu ops against map_value{, _adj} register typesDaniel Borkmann2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [ Upstream commit fce366a9dd0ddc47e7ce05611c266e8574a45116 ] While looking into map_value_adj, I noticed that alu operations directly on the map_value() resp. map_value_adj() register (any alu operation on a map_value() register will turn it into a map_value_adj() typed register) are not sufficiently protected against some of the operations. Two non-exhaustive examples are provided that the verifier needs to reject: i) BPF_AND on r0 (map_value_adj): 0: (bf) r2 = r10 1: (07) r2 += -8 2: (7a) *(u64 *)(r2 +0) = 0 3: (18) r1 = 0xbf842a00 5: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1 6: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+2 R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=48,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R10=fp 7: (57) r0 &= 8 8: (7a) *(u64 *)(r0 +0) = 22 R0=map_value_adj(ks=8,vs=48,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=8 R10=fp 9: (95) exit from 6 to 9: R0=inv,min_value=0,max_value=0 R10=fp 9: (95) exit processed 10 insns ii) BPF_ADD in 32 bit mode on r0 (map_value_adj): 0: (bf) r2 = r10 1: (07) r2 += -8 2: (7a) *(u64 *)(r2 +0) = 0 3: (18) r1 = 0xc24eee00 5: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1 6: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+2 R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=48,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R10=fp 7: (04) (u32) r0 += (u32) 0 8: (7a) *(u64 *)(r0 +0) = 22 R0=map_value_adj(ks=8,vs=48,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R10=fp 9: (95) exit from 6 to 9: R0=inv,min_value=0,max_value=0 R10=fp 9: (95) exit processed 10 insns Issue is, while min_value / max_value boundaries for the access are adjusted appropriately, we change the pointer value in a way that cannot be sufficiently tracked anymore from its origin. Operations like BPF_{AND,OR,DIV,MUL,etc} on a destination register that is PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE{,_ADJ} was probably unintended, in fact, all the test cases coming with 484611357c19 ("bpf: allow access into map value arrays") perform BPF_ADD only on the destination register that is PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ. Only for UNKNOWN_VALUE register types such operations make sense, f.e. with unknown memory content fetched initially from a constant offset from the map value memory into a register. That register is then later tested against lower / upper bounds, so that the verifier can then do the tracking of min_value / max_value, and properly check once that UNKNOWN_VALUE register is added to the destination register with type PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE{,_ADJ}. This is also what the original use-case is solving. Note, tracking on what is being added is done through adjust_reg_min_max_vals() and later access to the map value enforced with these boundaries and the given offset from the insn through check_map_access_adj(). Tests will fail for non-root environment due to prohibited pointer arithmetic, in particular in check_alu_op(), we bail out on the is_pointer_value() check on the dst_reg (which is false in root case as we allow for pointer arithmetic via env->allow_ptr_leaks). Similarly to PTR_TO_PACKET, one way to fix it is to restrict the allowed operations on PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE{,_ADJ} registers to 64 bit mode BPF_ADD. The test_verifier suite runs fine after the patch and it also rejects mentioned test cases. Fixes: 484611357c19 ("bpf: allow access into map value arrays") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: adjust verifier heuristicsDaniel Borkmann2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [ Upstream commit 3c2ce60bdd3d57051bf85615deec04a694473840 ] Current limits with regards to processing program paths do not really reflect today's needs anymore due to programs becoming more complex and verifier smarter, keeping track of more data such as const ALU operations, alignment tracking, spilling of PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ registers, and other features allowing for smarter matching of what LLVM generates. This also comes with the side-effect that we result in fewer opportunities to prune search states and thus often need to do more work to prove safety than in the past due to different register states and stack layout where we mismatch. Generally, it's quite hard to determine what caused a sudden increase in complexity, it could be caused by something as trivial as a single branch somewhere at the beginning of the program where LLVM assigned a stack slot that is marked differently throughout other branches and thus causing a mismatch, where verifier then needs to prove safety for the whole rest of the program. Subsequently, programs with even less than half the insn size limit can get rejected. We noticed that while some programs load fine under pre 4.11, they get rejected due to hitting limits on more recent kernels. We saw that in the vast majority of cases (90+%) pruning failed due to register mismatches. In case of stack mismatches, majority of cases failed due to different stack slot types (invalid, spill, misc) rather than differences in spilled registers. This patch makes pruning more aggressive by also adding markers that sit at conditional jumps as well. Currently, we only mark jump targets for pruning. For example in direct packet access, these are usually error paths where we bail out. We found that adding these markers, it can reduce number of processed insns by up to 30%. Another option is to ignore reg->id in probing PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL registers, which can help pruning slightly as well by up to 7% observed complexity reduction as stand-alone. Meaning, if a previous path with register type PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL for map X was found to be safe, then in the current state a PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL register for the same map X must be safe as well. Last but not least the patch also adds a scheduling point and bumps the current limit for instructions to be processed to a more adequate value. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf, verifier: add additional patterns to evaluate_reg_imm_aluJohn Fastabend2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [ Upstream commit 43188702b3d98d2792969a3377a30957f05695e6 ] Currently the verifier does not track imm across alu operations when the source register is of unknown type. This adds additional pattern matching to catch this and track imm. We've seen LLVM generating this pattern while working on cilium. Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: prevent leaking pointer via xadd on unpriviledgedDaniel Borkmann2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | commit 6bdf6abc56b53103324dfd270a86580306e1a232 upstream. Leaking kernel addresses on unpriviledged is generally disallowed, for example, verifier rejects the following: 0: (b7) r0 = 0 1: (18) r2 = 0xffff897e82304400 3: (7b) *(u64 *)(r1 +48) = r2 R2 leaks addr into ctx Doing pointer arithmetic on them is also forbidden, so that they don't turn into unknown value and then get leaked out. However, there's xadd as a special case, where we don't check the src reg for being a pointer register, e.g. the following will pass: 0: (b7) r0 = 0 1: (7b) *(u64 *)(r1 +48) = r0 2: (18) r2 = 0xffff897e82304400 ; map 4: (db) lock *(u64 *)(r1 +48) += r2 5: (95) exit We could store the pointer into skb->cb, loose the type context, and then read it out from there again to leak it eventually out of a map value. Or more easily in a different variant, too: 0: (bf) r6 = r1 1: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = 0 2: (bf) r2 = r10 3: (07) r2 += -8 4: (18) r1 = 0x0 6: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1 7: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+3 R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R6=ctx R10=fp 8: (b7) r3 = 0 9: (7b) *(u64 *)(r0 +0) = r3 10: (db) lock *(u64 *)(r0 +0) += r6 11: (b7) r0 = 0 12: (95) exit from 7 to 11: R0=inv,min_value=0,max_value=0 R6=ctx R10=fp 11: (b7) r0 = 0 12: (95) exit Prevent this by checking xadd src reg for pointer types. Also add a couple of test cases related to this. Fixes: 1be7f75d1668 ("bpf: enable non-root eBPF programs") Fixes: 17a5267067f3 ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* bpf: don't trigger OOM killer under pressure with map allocDaniel Borkmann2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [ Upstream commit d407bd25a204bd66b7346dde24bd3d37ef0e0b05 ] This patch adds two helpers, bpf_map_area_alloc() and bpf_map_area_free(), that are to be used for map allocations. Using kmalloc() for very large allocations can cause excessive work within the page allocator, so i) fall back earlier to vmalloc() when the attempt is considered costly anyway, and even more importantly ii) don't trigger OOM killer with any of the allocators. Since this is based on a user space request, for example, when creating maps with element pre-allocation, we really want such requests to fail instead of killing other user space processes. Also, don't spam the kernel log with warnings should any of the allocations fail under pressure. Given that, we can make backend selection in bpf_map_area_alloc() generic, and convert all maps over to use this API for spots with potentially large allocation requests. Note, replacing the one kmalloc_array() is fine as overflow checks happen earlier in htab_map_alloc(), since it must also protect the multiplication for vmalloc() should kmalloc_array() fail. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* FROMLIST: bpf: cgroup skb progs cannot access ld_abs/indDaniel Borkmann2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit fb9a307d11d6 ("bpf: Allow CGROUP_SKB eBPF program to access sk_buff") enabled programs of BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB type to use ld_abs/ind instructions. However, at this point, we cannot use them, since offsets relative to SKF_LL_OFF will end up pointing skb_mac_header(skb) out of bounds since in the egress path it is not yet set at that point in time, but only after __dev_queue_xmit() did a general reset on the mac header. bpf_internal_load_pointer_neg_helper() will then end up reading data from a wrong offset. BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB programs can use bpf_skb_load_bytes() already to access packet data, which is also more flexible than the insns carried over from cBPF. Fixes: fb9a307d11d6 ("bpf: Allow CGROUP_SKB eBPF program to access sk_buff") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Chenbo Feng <fengc@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> (url: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/771946/) Signed-off-by: Chenbo Feng <fengc@google.com> Bug: 30950746 Change-Id: Ia32ac79d8c0d18f811ec101897284a8b60cb042a Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* FROMLIST: [net-next,v2,2/2] bpf: Remove the capability check for cgroup skb ↵Chenbo Feng2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | eBPF program Currently loading a cgroup skb eBPF program require a CAP_SYS_ADMIN capability while attaching the program to a cgroup only requires the user have CAP_NET_ADMIN privilege. We can escape the capability check when load the program just like socket filter program to make the capability requirement consistent. Change since v1: Change the code style in order to be compliant with checkpatch.pl preference (url: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/769460/) Signed-off-by: Chenbo Feng <fengc@google.com> Bug: 30950746 Change-Id: Ibe51235127d6f9349b8f563ad31effc061b278ed Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* FROMLIST: [net-next,v2,1/2] bpf: Allow CGROUP_SKB eBPF program to access sk_buffChenbo Feng2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This allows cgroup eBPF program to classify packet based on their protocol or other detail information. Currently program need CAP_NET_ADMIN privilege to attach a cgroup eBPF program, and A process with CAP_NET_ADMIN can already see all packets on the system, for example, by creating an iptables rules that causes the packet to be passed to userspace via NFLOG. (url: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/769459/) Signed-off-by: Chenbo Feng <fengc@google.com> Bug: 30950746 Change-Id: I11bef84ce26cf8b8f1b89483c32a7fcdd61ae926 Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* UPSTREAM: bpf: cgroup: fix documentation of __cgroup_bpf_update()Daniel Mack2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There's a 'not' missing in one paragraph. Add it. Fixes: 3007098494be ("cgroup: add support for eBPF programs") Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org> Reported-by: Rami Rosen <roszenrami@gmail.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Fixes: Change-Id: I3df35d8d3b1261503f9b5bcd90b18c9358f1ac28        ("cgroup: add support for eBPF programs") (cherry picked from commit 01ae87eab53675cbdabd5c4d727c4a35e397cce0) Signed-off-by: Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
* BACKPORT: bpf: introduce BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE flagAlexei Starovoitov2022-04-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE flag is used in BPF_PROG_ATTACH command to the given cgroup the descendent cgroup will be able to override effective bpf program that was inherited from this cgroup. By default it's not passed, therefore override is disallowed. Examples: 1. prog X attached to /A with default prog Y fails to attach to /A/B and /A/B/C Everything under /A runs prog X 2. prog X attached to /A with allow_override. prog Y fails to attach to /A/B with default (non-override) prog M attached to /A/B with allow_override. Everything under /A/B runs prog M only. 3. prog X attached to /A with allow_override. prog Y fails to attach to /A with default. The user has to detach first to switch the mode. In the future this behavior may be extended with a chain of non-overridable programs. Also fix the bug where detach from cgroup where nothing is attached was not throwing error. Return ENOENT in such case. Add several testcases and adjust libbpf. Fixes: 3007098494be ("cgroup: add support for eBPF programs") Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Fixes: Change-Id: I3df35d8d3b1261503f9b5bcd90b18c9358f1ac28        ("cgroup: add support for eBPF programs") [AmitP: Refactored original patch for android-4.9 where libbpf sources are in samples/bpf/ and test_cgrp2_attach2, test_cgrp2_sock, and test_cgrp2_sock2 sample tests do not exist.] (cherry picked from commit 7f677633379b4abb3281cdbe7e7006f049305c03) Signed-off-by: Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Chatur27 <jasonbright2709@gmail.com>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2025-12-08 19:17:38 +0000