diff options
| author | Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com> | 2020-07-20 21:14:33 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Rahul Shahare <rshaha@codeaurora.org> | 2020-11-06 20:13:16 +0530 |
| commit | 5debc0eac4b6946f2bfb289f87e7b52f6c9bc56d (patch) | |
| tree | 4586292fd2b686cb32f70e5f241bd3283fb152e8 | |
| parent | b18a62c574dbdcd145e6ead2fdad481301ab2429 (diff) | |
binder: fix UAF when releasing todo list
When releasing a thread todo list when tearing down
a binder_proc, the following race was possible which
could result in a use-after-free:
1. Thread 1: enter binder_release_work from binder_thread_release
2. Thread 2: binder_update_ref_for_handle() calls binder_dec_node_ilocked()
3. Thread 2: dec nodeA --> 0 (will free node)
4. Thread 1: ACQ inner_proc_lock
5. Thread 2: block on inner_proc_lock
6. Thread 1: dequeue work (BINDER_WORK_NODE, part of nodeA)
7. Thread 1: REL inner_proc_lock
8. Thread 2: ACQ inner_proc_lock
9. Thread 2: todo list cleanup, but work was already dequeued
10. Thread 2: free node
11. Thread 2: REL inner_proc_lock
12. Thread 1: deref w->type (UAF)
The problem was that for a BINDER_WORK_NODE, the binder_work element
must not be accessed after releasing the inner_proc_lock while
processing the todo list elements since another thread might be
handling a deref on the node containing the binder_work element
leading to the node being freed.
Bug: 161151868
Signed-off-by: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Change-Id: I4ae752abfe1aa38872be6f266ddd271802952625
Git-repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
Git-commit: cebe72f19bebdee8fc9f1b31dd21a88a259ff419
Signed-off-by: Alam Md Danish <amddan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rahul Shahare <rshaha@codeaurora.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/android/binder.c | 35 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 25 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/android/binder.c b/drivers/android/binder.c index 9fa18e8f25ac..f0544e72aa2b 100644 --- a/drivers/android/binder.c +++ b/drivers/android/binder.c @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ struct binder_device { struct binder_work { struct list_head entry; - enum { + enum binder_work_type { BINDER_WORK_TRANSACTION = 1, BINDER_WORK_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE, BINDER_WORK_RETURN_ERROR, @@ -921,27 +921,6 @@ static struct binder_work *binder_dequeue_work_head_ilocked( return w; } -/** - * binder_dequeue_work_head() - Dequeues the item at head of list - * @proc: binder_proc associated with list - * @list: list to dequeue head - * - * Removes the head of the list if there are items on the list - * - * Return: pointer dequeued binder_work, NULL if list was empty - */ -static struct binder_work *binder_dequeue_work_head( - struct binder_proc *proc, - struct list_head *list) -{ - struct binder_work *w; - - binder_inner_proc_lock(proc); - w = binder_dequeue_work_head_ilocked(list); - binder_inner_proc_unlock(proc); - return w; -} - static void binder_defer_work(struct binder_proc *proc, enum binder_deferred_state defer); static void binder_free_thread(struct binder_thread *thread); @@ -4442,13 +4421,17 @@ static void binder_release_work(struct binder_proc *proc, struct list_head *list) { struct binder_work *w; + enum binder_work_type wtype; while (1) { - w = binder_dequeue_work_head(proc, list); + binder_inner_proc_lock(proc); + w = binder_dequeue_work_head_ilocked(list); + wtype = w ? w->type : 0; + binder_inner_proc_unlock(proc); if (!w) return; - switch (w->type) { + switch (wtype) { case BINDER_WORK_TRANSACTION: { struct binder_transaction *t; @@ -4482,9 +4465,11 @@ static void binder_release_work(struct binder_proc *proc, kfree(death); binder_stats_deleted(BINDER_STAT_DEATH); } break; + case BINDER_WORK_NODE: + break; default: pr_err("unexpected work type, %d, not freed\n", - w->type); + wtype); break; } } |
